Is Negative Calorie Food Theory True?

It is very easy to explain what that means negative calorie diet. According to this theory to digest certain foods, your body burns more calories than the foods actually contain himself. For example, an orange contains about 50 calories. Let's say for their digestion, your body needs 75 calories. As a result, your body 25 calories will spend more on their own existing fat burning so you lose weight.

There are many fruit andVegetables on the list of negative calorie foods. The Negative Calorie Diet claims you can with a deficit of calories in your body rise through the consumption of asparagus, broccoli, onions, garlic, lettuce, spinach, cucumbers, apples, oranges, watermelons and more trouble.

I have a feeling that this theory sounds a bit controversional. Suppose a person eats only negative calorie foods. How to eat for every orange this man, should he or burn it to withhold 25Calories. Day by day their bodies will burn an amount of energy from its previous gatherings. This person would soon cease to exist!

Critics of the negative calorie diet claim that there was no food on the "negative" calories, and no one can eat in this way to lose weight. On the other hand I must admit that this theory is the consumption of foods rich in promoting vitamins and minerals. And this is a great advantage for our bodies.

Up to the Pro or Contrascientific evidence is available, let's say that the food supply power up with relatively little inclination cause that a listed overweight.

sciatic nerve leg pain low carb low protein diet